|Instructions for Authors|| > For Authors > Instructions for Authors
Revised on JAN 27, 2022
1. About this journal
1-1. General information
The Pediatric Emergency Medicine Journal (Pediatr Emerg Med J, PEMJ; pISSN 2383-4897, eISSN 2508-5506) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Korean Society of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (KSPEM). The KSPEM holds the copyright on all submitted articles. It launched on June 30, 2014. It is to be published biannually, on June 30 and December 31. Supplement issues may be published. The journal is operated according to the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing 3rd ed (https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing). PEMJ is an open access journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The journal is indexed in KoreaMed (https://koreamed.org/), Synapse (https://synapse.koreamed.org/), KMbase (https://kmbase.medric.or.kr/), and Korea Citation Index (https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/main.kci).
Manuscripts for submission to PEMJ should be prepared according to the following instructions. For issues not addressed in these instructions, authors should refer to the Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals by the ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editor, http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/), and Good Publication Practice Guidelines for Medical Journals, 2nd ed (Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors, KAMJE, https://www.kamje.or.kr/board/view?b_name=bo_publication&bo_id=7&per_page).
1-2. Aims and scope
PEMJ aims at pediatricians, emergency physicians, and other health care providers who are interested in pediatric emergency medicine. The journal focuses on both basic and clinical research of pediatric emergency medicine such as pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and simulation. PEMJ accepts original articles, reviews, editorials, case reports, brief communications, correspondences, and special contributions.
1-3. Subscription information
The PEMJ is freely distributed to members of the KSPEM and relevant institutions. Full text files are also freely available at the official (https://www.pemj.org) and mobile (pemj.org/m) websites. For subscription, please contact us.
1-4. Editorial board
|Korean Society of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Seoul, Korea|
|Ji Whan Han ||The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea|
|Jae Ryoung Kwak ||Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon, Korea|
|Hyuksool Kwon ||Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea|
|Mi Jin Kim ||University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Korea|
|Jung-Youn Kim ||Korea University, Seoul, Korea|
|Jung Heon Kim ||Ajou University, Suwon, Korea|
|Hyung-il Kim ||Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea|
|So-Hyun Nam ||Dong-A University, Busan, Korea|
|Jun Sung Park ||University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea|
|Woori Bae ||The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea|
|So Hyun Paek ||Cha University, Bundang, Korea|
|Joo-Hyun Suh ||Seoul, Korea|
|Bongjin Lee ||Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea|
|Jeong-Yong Lee ||University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea|
|Hyun Jung Lee ||Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Korea|
|Ikwan Chang ||Seoul, Korea|
|Jae Yun Jung ||Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea|
|Jin Hee Jeong ||Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea|
|Jea Yeon Choi ||Gachon University, Incheon, Korea|
|Soyun Hwang ||Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea|
|Yunju Suh||Centereach, NY|
|Ae Ri Kim||Korean Society of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Seoul, Korea|
1-5. Contact us
PEMJ editorial office
The Korean Society of Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Chungmu-building office 213, 197, Toegye-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04557, Korea
TEL: +82-2-3674-7888, FAX: +82-2-3674-7889
E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org, Website: http://kspem.org
2. For authors and reviewers
2-1. Information for contributors
I. General information
PEMJ is the official journal of the KSPEM, published biannually. The journal is operated according to the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing 3rd ed (https://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines-new/principles-transparency-and-best-practice-scholarly-publishing). There are no specific limits to contribution requirements, but the scope of content should be in accord with the "aims and scope" of the journal. PEMJ solicits competent investigators’ contributions including original articles, reviews, editorials, case reports, brief communications, correspondences, and special contributions. Authors should refer to the “Information for contributors” of the journal, the Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals by the ICMJE (http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/), and Good Publication Practice Guidelines for Medical Journals, 2nd ed (KAMJE, https://www.kamje.or.kr/board/view?b_name=bo_publication&bo_id=7&per_page).
II. Editorial policy
The editorial board presumes that all authors listed in a manuscript have agreed to the following policy of PEMJ on submission of manuscript.
Any authors may submit manuscripts of original articles, reviews, editorials, case reports, brief communications, correspondences, and special contributions written in Korean or English. Except for negotiated secondary publications, manuscripts submitted to the Journal must be previously unpublished and not under consideration for publication elsewhere.
The editorial board reserves the right to make corrections, both literary and technical, to the papers. Under any circumstances, the identities of the reviewers will not be revealed. It is the author's responsibility to ensure that a patient's anonymity be carefully protected, to verify that any experimental investigation with human participants reported in the manuscript was performed with informed consent, and to follow all guidelines for experimental investigation with human participants required by the institution(s) with which all the authors are affiliated.
If an author should be added or deleted after the submission, it is the responsibility of the corresponding author to ensure that the author concerned are aware of and agree to the change in authorship. The editorial board has no responsibility for such changes.
PEMJ is published biannually on JUN 30 and DEC 31. All published articles become permanent properties of KSPEM and they may not be published elsewhere without written permission.
III. Research and publication ethics
Regarding policies on research and publication ethics not addressed in these instructions, authors should refer to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines on good publication (http://publicationethics.org/), the Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals by the ICMJE (http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/) or Good Publication Practice Guidelines for Medical Journals, 2nd ed (KAMJE, https://www.kamje.or.kr/board/view?b_name=bo_publication&bo_id=7&per_page).
III-A. Statement of human and animal rights and informed consent
Any investigations involving humans and animals should be approved by the institutional review board (IRB) or institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC), respectively, of the institution where the study took place. In addition, investigations with pathogens requiring a high degree of biosafety should obtain approval by relevant committee (institutional biosafety committee). Informed consent should be obtained, unless waived by the IRB, from patients (or legal guardians) who participated in clinical investigations. Human participants should not be identifiable, such that patients' names, initials, hospital numbers, dates of birth or other protected healthcare information should not be disclosed. If experiments involve animals, the research should be based on national or institutional guidelines for animal care and use. Original articles submitted to PEMJ that address any investigation involving humans and animals should include a description about whether the study was conducted under an approval by the IRB (with or without patient informed consent) or IACUC, respectively. IRB no. is required for submission process, and if absent, the process cannot proceed.
PEMJ can request an approval by the IRB or IACUC when necessary. It is noteworthy that a Korean act of bioethics and biosafety was revised on November 11, 2014.
III-B. Authorship and author’s responsibility
The corresponding author takes primary responsibility for communication with the journal during the manuscript submission, peer review, and publication process, and typically ensures that all the journal’s administrative requirements, such as providing details of authorship, ethics committee approval, clinical trial registration documentation, and gathering conflicts of interest (COI) forms and statements, are properly completed, although these duties may be delegated to one or more coauthors. The corresponding author should be available throughout the submission and peer review process to respond to editorial queries in a timely manner, and should be available to respond to critiques of the work and cooperate with any requests from the journal for data or additional information or questions about the paper even after publication. Authors may appeal against the editorial decisions by e-mail (email@example.com).
Authors must meet all aspects of the following 4 criteria: (1) Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the work; (2) Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; (3) Final approval of the version to be published; and (4) Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Any persons who do not meet any aspect of the above criteria, may be listed as contributors in the Acknowledgments section.
Only one corresponding author is allowed. A footnote indicating that the two first authors made equal contributions is permissible, as long as the authors certify that each had a "first author" role equally. The editorial board does not allow adding authors or changing the first or the corresponding authors once its decision of ‘Accept’ is made. Any change in the byline (addition or deletion of authors, change in the name order) requires a letter signed by all authors indicating agreement with the same. The editorial board has no responsibility for such changes.
III-C. Originality and duplicate publication
Manuscripts under review or published by other journals will not be accepted for publication in PEMJ, and articles published in this journal are not allowed to be reproduced in whole or in part in any type of publication without permission of the editorial board. Figures and tables can be used freely if original source is verified according to Creative Commons Non-Commercial License. It is mandatory for all authors to resolve any copyright issues when citing a figure or table from a different journal that is not open access.
III-D. Secondary publication
It is possible to republish manuscripts if the manuscripts satisfy the condition of secondary publication of ICMJE as followings: certain types of articles, such as guidelines produced by governmental agencies and professional organizations, may need to reach the widest possible audience. In such instances, editors sometimes deliberately publish material that is also being published in other journals, with the agreement of the authors and the editors of those journals. Secondary publication for various other reasons, in the same or another language, especially in other countries, is justifiable and can be beneficial provided that the following conditions are met. The authors should receive approval from the editors of both journals (the editor concerned with secondary publication must have a photocopy, reprint, or manuscript of the primary version). The priority of the primary publication is respected by a publication interval of at least 1 week (unless specifically negotiated otherwise by both editors).
The paper for secondary publication is intended for a different group of readers; an abbreviated version could be sufficient. The secondary version faithfully reflects the data and interpretations of the primary version. The footnote on the title page of the secondary version informs readers, peers, and documenting agencies that the paper has been published in whole or in part and states the primary reference. A suitable footnote might read: “This article is based on a study first reported in the title of journal, with full reference.”
III-E. Conflicts of interest
COI may exist when an author (or the author’s institution or employer) has financial or personal relationships or affiliations that could bias the author’s decisions regarding the manuscript. Authors are expected to provide detailed information about all relevant financial interests and relationships or financial conflicts, particularly those present at the time the research was conducted and through publication, as well as other financial interests (such as patent applications in preparation), that represent potential future financial gain. All disclosures of any potential COI, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations (other than those affiliations listed in the title page of the manuscript) relevant to the subject of their manuscript will be disclosed by the corresponding author on behalf of each coauthor, if any, as part of the submission process. Likewise, authors without COI will be requested to state so as part of the submission process. If authors are uncertain about what constitutes a relevant financial interest or relationship, they should contact the editorial board. Failure to include this information in the manuscript will prohibit commencement of the review process of the manuscript. For all accepted manuscripts, each author’s disclosures of COI, relevant financial interests and affiliations, and declarations of no such interests will be published. The policy requesting disclosure of COI applies for all manuscript submissions. If an author’s disclosure of potential COI is determined to be inaccurate or incomplete after publication, an erratum will be published to rectify the original published disclosure statement. Authors are also required to report detailed information regarding all financial and material support for the research and work, including but not limited to grant support, funding sources, and provision of equipment and supplies as part of the submission process. For all accepted manuscripts, each author’s source of funding will be published.
The authors should disclose all potential COI. If there is a disclosure, the editors, reviewers, and readers can interpret the manuscripts with this understanding.
III-F. Process to manage research and publication misconduct
When the editorial board faces suspected cases of research and publication misconduct such as duplicate publication, plagiarism, fraudulent or fabricated data, changes in authorship, undisclosed COI, ethical problem, a reviewer who has appropriated an author’s idea or data, complaints against editors, and etc., the resolving process will follow the flowchart provided by COPE (http://publicationethics.org/resources/flowcharts). The Research and Publication Ethics Subcommittee makes a decision on suspected cases. In this process, a debatable matter may be consulted to KAMJE.
III-G. Data sharing
The journal encourages authors to state the data sharing in their submission. Authors may state linking to a repository or declaring confidentiality of the data. All manuscripts reporting clinical trials must be submitted with a data sharing statement. If authors describe this in their manuscripts, the description will be published alongside their manuscripts.
III-H. Intellectual property
All published articles become permanent intellectual properties of the KSPEM, and they may not be published elsewhere without written permission. Copyrights of the articles are owned by the KSPEM. PEMJ is an open access journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
III-I. Post-publication discussions and corrections
The post-publication discussion is available via the correspondences. Readers can express a concern about a published article by submitting a correspondence on the article within 8 weeks of publication. In a case of error in the article, it can be corrected through the author’s reply to the correspondence, erratum or retraction.
III-J. Editorial responsibilities
The editorial board will continuously work towards monitoring and safeguarding publication ethics: guidelines for retracting articles; plagiarism screening for all manuscripts (https://crosscheck.ithenticate.com/en_us/login), maintenance of the integrity of the academic record; preclusion of business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standard; publishing errata, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed; avoiding plagiarism, and fraudulent data. The responsibilities of the editorial board shall include: responsibility and authority to reject or accept article; avoid COI with respect to articles they reject/accept; acceptance of a paper when reasonably certain; promoting publication of erratum or retraction when errors are found; preservation of the anonymity of reviewers.
IV. Preparing manuscripts
IV-A. Categories of manuscripts
PEMJ publishes original article, review, editorial, case report, brief communication, correspondence, and special contribution.
- Original article: Original investigations in areas relevant to pediatric emergency medicine. Maximum 4,000 words, 10 tables or figures, and 30 references. Include a structured abstract and its length should not exceed 300 words. Additional material may be placed in appendices. Systematic reviews are critical assessments and evaluations of research (not simply summaries) that attempt to address a focused clinical question using methods designed to reduce the likelihood of bias. Meta-analyses combine this with aggregate analyses. This kind of manuscripts should be structured into the subheadings: introduction, main subject, and conclusion. Such articles must be compliant with relevant guidelines and include a narrative abstract and its length should not exceed 300 words. In case of systematic review, the length is limited to 5,000-8,000 words with a maximum of 100 references.
- Review: Clinical reviews should address specific clinical questions or relevant issues. Such articles should summarize current research relevant to the questions they address, be evidence-based to the extent possible, be balanced, and detail the importance of the questions or issues. Include a narrative abstract and its length should not exceed 300 words. Do not combine a case report with your review. This kind of manuscripts should be structured into the subheadings: introduction, main subject, and conclusion. The length is limited to 5,000-8,000 words with a maximum of 100 references.
- Case report: Case report must be a brief description of a previously undocumented disease process, a unique manifestation or treatment of a known disease process or unreported complications of treatment regimens. Entities previously reported elsewhere must be extremely important to be considered. Include an abstract with keywords, introduction, case, discussion focusing on the implications of the case reported, references, and figures or tables. Maximum 1,500 words, 20 references, and 4 tables or figures. The abstracts should not exceed 200 words.
- Correspondence: Discussion, observations, opinions, corrections, and comments on topics appearing in PEMJ; very brief reports or other items of interest. Letters discussing a PEMJ article should be received within 8 weeks of the article's publication. The original authors will be given the opportunity to reply. Letters of topics unrelated to the science of medicine, as well as those containing personal criticisms, will not be published. An abstract is not required. Maximum 500 words, 5 references.
- Brief communication: This kind of manuscript should be prepared in the following sequence: title page, abstract with key words, text without section titles, acknowledgments (if necessary), references, and tables or figures. Maximums: narrative abstract, 100 words; word counts of the text, 1,500 words; number of references, 20; figures, 2; table, 1.
- Editorials: Authoritative comments or opinions on controversial matters with significant implications for pediatric emergency medicine; or, qualified, thorough analysis and criticism of PEMJ articles. Maximum 1,500 words.
- Special contribution: This kind of manuscript does not conform to a traditional format. Please discuss with the editorial board before submission.
- Authors should discuss with the editorial board if their article exceeds the maximum number of words, figures or tables allowed.
IV-B. Reporting guidelines for specific study designs
For the specific study design, such as randomized control studies, studies of diagnostic accuracy, meta-analyses, observational studies, and non-randomized studies, it is recommended that the authors follow the reporting guidelines listed in the following table.
IV-C. Registration of clinical trial research
Any research that deals with a clinical trial should be registered to the primary registry, such as the WHO International Clinical Trials Portal (http://www.who.int/ictrp/en/), NIH ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/), ISRCTN Resister (https://www.isrctn.com/), Netherlands Trial Register (http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/index.asp), and Clinical research information system (https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/index.jsp). The clinical trial registration number should be published at the end of the abstract.
IV-D. Preparing manuscripts
We accept manuscripts written in English or Korean. Even in Korean manuscripts, title page, abstract with keywords, references, tables, figures, and figure legends must be written in English. Authors who are non-native speakers should receive English-editing service. All text files should be in Microsoft Word format (doc or docx, 2007 and above), and all figures need to be in JPG/JPEG/TIFF/PPT format. Files should not be uploaded as PDF. The manuscript should be typed in a 12-point font and double-spaced on A4 with 1 inch-margin on both sides.
The manuscript should be organized in the following order: full title page (including all the authors’ details) as a separate file; blinded main document in a single file, which starts with abstract with keywords, introduction, methods, results, discussion, ORCIDs (all authors), COI, funding sources, acknowledgments (optional), references, and figure legends; tables; and figures.
The use of abbreviations should be minimized. When used, they should be fully described at first appearance in the text and described in the parenthesis. Use of Korean terms need to be consistent with the latest version of lexicon published from Korean Medical Association (http://term.kma.org/). If Korean terms are unavailable (medical terms, proper nouns, place names, drug names or units), authors may use English terms. Even if Korean terms are poorly understandable, authors should use only Korean terms after describing the corresponding English terms in parentheses at first appearance. Leave blanks between English words and subsequent parentheses (c.f., no blanks between Korean words and parentheses).
Radiation measurements and laboratory values should be in accordance with the International System of Units (SI). However, some customarily used units (e.g., mmHg) are acceptable. Leave blanks in front of units except % and ℃. P values should be typed in capital letters not in italics in the text (“P”) and should be marked as “P value” in the table.
PEMJ performs double-blinded review of the submitted manuscripts. The authors' names, affiliations, and any other remarks that may identify the authors should not appear in the main document, figures, and appendices for the blinded review. In case identifying details are found, the editorial board will ask the corresponding author to re-upload the files after deleting such details before referring peer review.
- The names and locations (city or province/country or state) of the manufacturers of equipment and generic names should be given.
- If you need subheadings, you should number them in following order: 1., 2., 3., 4., 1), 2), 3), 4), a., b., c., d.
- Please also refer to PEMJ article templates and recent articles for style.
IV-E. Title page
Include the following items on the full title page.
- Type of manuscript (e.g., original article)
- Title: Both English (≤50 words) and Korean (≤50 letters) titles are needed (Even English manuscripts need Korean titles).
- Full names, affiliations, and order of all authors: Each author’s full name must be provided in the order of first name, middle name, and last name. Academic degree is not required. When authors from different institutions (name of academic institution is preferred) are included, the authors should be matched with their organizations by placing the relevant organization number in superscript after each author’s name.
e.g., Jun Dong Park1
1Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Information of the corresponding author (ORCID, postal address, phone number, fax number, and e-mail address).
- Running title: This title will be printed at the top of each page of the published paper and should be no longer than 10 words (including spaces).
- Proof of English-editing (optional): Authors who are non-native speakers may indicate the fact of English-editing and name of the agency (e.g., The manuscript underwent English-editing by ABC [URL]).
IV-F. Main body
The main body is a blinded document for review and should contain the following components in a single file, which starts with abstract and keywords, introduction, methods, results, discussion, ORCIDs (all authors), COI, funding sources, acknowledgments (optional), references, and figure legends. Tables and figures should not be embedded in the text.
Abstracts for original articles should be 300 words or less, and structured into the subheadings: Purpose, Methods (include information on design, setting, participants, interventions, and main outcomes measured), Results, and Conclusion. But narrative abstracts are necessary in review, case report, and brief communication. In your results, you should emphasize the magnitude of findings over test statistics, ideally including the size of effect and its confidence intervals for the principal outcomes. Citations should not be used in the abstract. Abbreviations should be minimized and, if used, must be defined within the abstract by the full term followed by its abbreviation in parentheses. Keywords should be listed using 5-10 Medical Subject Headings (MeSH, http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MBrowser.html) joined by semicolons. In case of an RCT, the trials registry number should appear after the conclusion (e.g., NCT01616745).
- Main body
1) Introduction: The most effective introduction section should concisely argue how the topic is new, scientifically important, and clinically relevant. Usually, we recommend three paragraphs: The first paragraph to describe the circumstances or historical context that led you to investigate the issue. The second to describe why your investigation is consequential. What are its potential implications? How does it relate to issues raised in the first paragraph? Why is this specific investigation the next logical step? The last to explain the goals of this investigation: Clearly state the specific research objective or hypothesis and your primary outcome measure.
- This section should include subsections with contents that detail the study design, study setting and population, study protocol, measurements or key outcome measures, and data analysis (include sample size determinations and other relevant information, the names of statistical tests, and software used).
- The role of funding organizations and sponsors in the conduct and reporting of the study should be included here.
- When equipment is used in a study, provide in parentheses the model number, name, and location of the manufacturer.
- If citing an in-press paper for the description of methods, please upload a copy of the in-press paper for the editor and reviewers. This in-press material will be handled with appropriate confidentiality.
- Research involving human participants or animals must meet local, legal and institutional requirements, and generally accepted ethical principles such as those set out in the Nuremberg Code, the Belmont Report, or the Declaration of Helsinki.
- Manuscripts reporting data involving human participants must indicate a positive review by an IRB or equivalent. This requirement includes studies that qualify for IRB expedited status. Most institutions require IRB review of studies that qualify for exempt status and that this determination be made by the IRB, not by the authors. The “Methods” section of the manuscript must explicitly state that IRB approval was obtained, that the IRB determined the study was exempt, or that the study did not involve human participants (e.g., publicly available and previously de-identified information from national data sets, or other studies not meeting the definition of human participants research, additional information available at www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/cdebiol.html). IRB approval number should be typed after this remark (e.g., IRB no. ##-##-###). The “Methods” section should also indicate the type of consent used (written, verbal, or waived), and confirm that consent was obtained from all participants (unless waived by the IRB).
- Manuscripts reporting the results of investigations of live vertebrate animals must indicate approval by an IACUC or equivalent. We reserve the right to request submission of IRB or IACUC documentation at any time.
- When working with administrative databases, authors should be diligent in checking the validity of variables (e.g., by cross-checking with other variables in the dataset) and patterns of missing data. Both of these factors can bias results. Authors should also recognize that causal inferences are generally limited when interpreting results from administrative data sources. For analyses using probability samples, care should be taken to use clusters, strata and weights in analyses and that substantially restricting such samples (e.g., to small age groups) may create bias and unusual associations between variables.
- Authors considering performing survey projects and submitting survey manuscript should review the following commentary, which discusses some of the key features of survey methodology. (Mello MJ, Merchant RC, Clark MA. Surveying emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20(4):409-12.)
3) Results: This section should be concise, and include the statistical analysis. Results presented in tables or figures should be referred to in the text, but the material should not be presented again. In addition to the data collected in the study, the results should also indicate the success of protocol implementation (e.g., was blinding successful, was there a high inter-rater reliability?). In keeping with the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine regarding gender-specific research, ensure correct use of the terms sex (when reporting biological factors) and gender (identity, psychosocial or cultural factors). We ask that “all papers reporting the outcomes of clinical trials report on men and women separately unless a trial is of a sex-specific condition (such as endometrial or prostatic cancer).” (Women’s Health Research: Progress, Pitfalls, and Promise; National Academies Press 2010, available at https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2011.562837). If the study was done involving an exclusive population, for example in only one sex, authors should justify the reasons, except in obvious cases.
4) Discussion: Briefly summarize the results and how they relate to your area of investigation. Consider only those published articles directly relevant to interpreting your results and placing them in context. Do not stress statistical significance over clinical importance. Do not use a separate conclusion section, but instead append it as the last paragraph of the Discussion beginning something like: "In summary . . .” Take care that the conclusion is restricted to what can be justified by your experimental results. Discuss shortcomings and biases related to study design and execution.
- ORCIDs, COI, funding sources, and acknowledgments
1) All authors must state their ORCIDs, and declare their COI and funding organizations or sponsors. It not applicable, they also should state the nonexistence of COI or funding source.
2) Persons who have made substantial contribution, but who are not eligible as authors are named in the acknowledgments (optional).
1) The list should be numbered consecutively in the order in which they are first mentioned in the text. Every reference must be cited at least once in the text. Each reference should be cited as superscripts (Vancouver style). Although the superscript should be typed after author’s surname, it should be typed at the end of the sentence but ahead of the period, if no author’s surname is typed in there. If authors’ number is less than three, all the authors’ surname should be typed. However, in case of three or more authors, the superscript should be located after the first author’s surname.
2) The abbreviated journal title should be used according to the NLM catalog (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/journals) or the KoreaMed (http://www.koreamed.org/).
3) If there are six or fewer authors in a reference, list all authors. If the number of authors is greater than six, list the initial six authors, and then abbreviate the rest of the authors with by “et al.”
4) Personal communications and unpublished data should be cited in the body of the paper in parentheses, not listed in the references section. Manuscripts that have been accepted for publication may be listed as “Forthcoming”; manuscripts that have been submitted or are under revision but have not been accepted should not be cited as references.
5) The use of abstracts that have not been published as full manuscripts is discouraged.
6) Authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the references and text citations.
7) Number of references is limited to 100 in reviews, 30 in original articles (but, 100 in systematic reviews), 20 in case reports and brief communications, and 5 in correspondences. The style and punctuation for references should follow the format illustrated in the following examples. For types not addressed in these examples, the author is referred to the Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals by the ICMJE (http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/), and Good Publication Practice Guidelines for Medical Journals, 2nd ed (KAMJE, https://www.kamje.or.kr/board/view?b_name=bo_publication&bo_id=7&per_page).
1. Hong JS, Kim MJ, Jeong JY, Kim JS, Hong ES. Influenza A virus associated febrile seizures in pediatric emergency department during influenza seasons. Pediatr Emerg Med J 2014;1:89-95.
2. Shapiro AM, Lakey JR, Ryan EA, Korbutt GS, Toth E, Warnock GL, et al. Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen. N Engl J Med 2000;343:230-8.
JOURNAL ARTICLE published electronically ahead of the print version
3. Bellini T, Piccotti E. A potential impact of the donning and doffing policy on emergency department length of stay during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Pediatr Emerg Med J 2021 Apr 19 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.22470/pemj.2021.00227.
4. Meltzer PS, Kallioniemi A. Trent JM. Chromosome alterations in human solid tumors. In: Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, editors. The genetics basis of human cancer. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002. p. 93-113.
5. Statistics Korea. Cause of death statistics [Internet]. Daejeon (Korea): Statistics Korea; c2015 [cited 2015 Sep 20]. Available from: http://kostat.go.kr/portal/english/surveyOutlines/1/2/index.static.
Tables should be referenced in the main text in sequential order, and uploaded separately with the text. A descriptive title that is composed of a phrase without a period at the top of the table. Define all abbreviations in a footnote to the table. If necessary, footnote signs can be used as listed order; *, †, ‡, §, ||, ¶, **, ††, ‡‡, §§, ||||, ¶¶. If a table has been previously published should be accompanied by the written consent of the copyright holder and the footnote must acknowledge the original source. Tables should be typed in English.
- Figures and legends
Figures must be referenced in the text in sequential order. Figures should clarify and augment the text. Each figure should be submitted on a separate page. Legends should be typed in 12-point font, double-spaced, and located after the references with the titles in clauses. Figures in PDF are not acceptable. Photographs must be submitted electronically according to the following specifications: color photographs should be saved as TIF files in RGB at a minimum of 12.5 cm (5 in.) in width at 300 dpi; black and white photographs should be saved as TIF files in grayscale at a minimum of 12.5 cm (5 in.) in width at 300 dpi. Authors should note that all photographs with discriminability of the patients’ identity (not limited to the face) must be submitted with the publication of patient information form and the authors take the legal responsibility in case of lawsuits. Symbols, arrows or letters used to identify parts of the figures must be explained clearly in the legend. The illustrations of pathological tissue should state clearly the type of stain and the magnifying power (e.g., H&E, ×400), and the main contents should be marked by signs or arrows on the picture. Line drawings should be original copies. A previously published figure should be accompanied by the footnote acknowledging the original source and the consent of copyright holder.
V. Submitting manuscripts
V-A. First submission
Corresponding authors should submit manuscripts via the submission system (https://submit.pemj.org/
). Registration is required for the first time user. If you do not have an account, click "Registration" button and make your account. ID should be your email address being actively used now. If you have an account but forgot your password, click the "Forgot password" button. Your password will be given to your email address on your request. To begin, enter your User ID and password into the boxes provided, and click. Subsequently click “Author Center.” At the “Author Main” screen, click “New Submissions.” After that, fill in “Submission Agreement” and follow steps 1-8.
Step 1. Title, Abstract: Choose manuscript type and topic, then enter your title, running title, abstract, and keywords into the appropriate boxes. If you need to insert a special character, click the "Special Characters." If you are submitting a manuscript that does not require an Abstract, please type “N/A” in the Abstract box. Please type in corresponding author’s information including the address, phone number, fax number, and e-mail address.
Step 2. Authors: Enter the personal information of additional authors in the boxes.
Step 3. File upload: The “Manuscript file” should not include authors’ name or name of affiliations. Upload and select the correct file designation for each. You need to upload copyright transfer form, author contribution form with each author’s signature, and publication of patient information form (if needed) at this step.
Step 4. PDF conversion: Merged file will be created as PDF by clicking “Build PDF” button.
Step 5. Cover letter & additional info: Please, write down cover letters to the Editor-in-Chief. Authors of original articles and case reports must fill in IRB no. at this step, and if not, submissions cannot proceed.
Step 6. Suggest reviewers: Authors should provide contact information of 2 suggested reviewers who are not affiliated with the corresponding author’s institution. The journal may not use your suggestions.
Step 7. Preview: Review the information in the Preview chart for correctness; make changes if needed. If you have not completed a required step, you will not be able to submit your manuscript.
Step 8. Submit: Once it is submitted, you will be able to monitor the progress of your manuscript through the peer review process.
The revised manuscript should be uploaded via the submission system (https://submit.pemj.org/
). Failure to upload the revised manuscript within 60 days without any notice from the corresponding author may lead to a request for withdrawal or rejection by the Editor-in-Chief.
The corresponding author must indicate concisely what alterations have been made in response to the reviewers' comments point by point (any changes should be marked with underline or highlight function). When preparing your revised manuscript, prepare a “list of responses” to the comments. Your list of responses should be uploaded as a file in addition to your revised manuscript online. Acceptable reasons should be given for noncompliance with any recommendation of the reviewers.
- A “Major Revision” and a “Minor Revision” should be uploaded within 60 days of the decisions.
- Please carefully read and follow the instructions written here and those included in the reviewers’ comments.
- To start the upload of a revised manuscript, click the "Manuscripts in Revision" queue in the "Author Main" area. Then, find the submission needing the revision and click on the "Revision" link.
- Please submit a point-by-point “list of responses” to the editor/reviewer comments by uploading it as a Microsoft Word document file (doc/docx) on the "Attach File" page. Any changes in the authorship should be reported to the editor in the cover letter (refer to III-B. Authorship and author’s responsibility).
- For file uploading, if you have updated a file, please delete the original version and upload the revised file. To designate the order in which your files appear, use the "order" column on the "File upload" page.
- We need a revised Main Document and list of responses.
VI. Review process
- The submitted manuscript will first be evaluated at the editorial board regarding the possibility of plagiarism, completeness of the submitted materials, and their suitability to PEMJ. Prior to the peer review, the editorial board can reject manuscripts for misconduct, or request the authors for explanation. Manuscripts may be returned to the authors at this stage if they have serious flaws or are not suitable for PEMJ.
- Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by the editors and two peer reviewers. The reviewers make suggestions to the editorial board.
- PEMJ performs double-blinded peer review of the submitted manuscripts. Neither the peer reviewers nor the authors are revealed to each other. Authors may suggest preferred reviewers. However, this suggestion may not be accepted by the editorial board.
- The authors can monitor the progress of the manuscript throughout the review process at the submission system (https://submit.pemj.org/).
- The first review is finished within 60 days after the first submission. Reviewers consider the originality, scientific importance, study design, methodology, brevity in expression, priority for publication, and potential for revision. Reviewers should provide constructive criticism on the parts requiring revision. Submitted manuscripts will be rendered one of the following decisions: Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, and Reject. A revision needs to be submitted within 60 days of the decision. Otherwise, the manuscript is regarded as a new submission.
1) All submitted manuscripts are subject to the Crosscheck, and the editorial office can reject the manuscripts suspected of plagiarism.
2) Manuscripts for case reports regarding diseases that have already been reported cannot be published. However, they may be published after proper review process if they contain the discussion over unknown aspects of the disease, new diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, and unknown associated diseases.
3) If manuscripts regarding drugs or equipment have a potential for commercial use, the editorial office can consult proper specialists on them.
4) Manuscripts containing the contents which have already been rejected by PEMJ can be published only if substantially improved.
5) The editorial board reserves the right to make corrections to literary and technical flaws found in the accepted manuscripts after proper communication with the corresponding authors.
6) The editorial board can refer the editing process to outsourced manuscript editors.
- The decision to accept a manuscript is not based solely on the scientific validity and originality; other factors are considered, including the extent and importance of new information in the paper as compared with that in other papers being considered, the Journal's need to represent a wide range of topics, the overall suitability for PEMJ, and research and publication ethics.
- Decision letters usually, but not always, convey all factors considered for a particular decision. Occasionally, reviewers’ comments may appear to be inconsistent with the decision, which takes into consideration reviewers' comments as well as the additional factors listed above.
VII. Galley proof
The corresponding authors will receive an email with attached proofs in Microsoft Word format. The editorial board retains the prerogatives to question the authors about major alterations that might affect the scientific content of the manuscripts. The authors should minimize revisions other than correcting errors or answering the editorial queries. If the author-corrected proofs are not returned within 48 hours, the editorial board proceed with the publication, regarding the absence of reply as the agreement on the editorial corrections. The authors are responsible for any fault found after the publication.
VIII. Copyrights and article processing charge (APC)
Copyrights of all published materials are owned by the KSPEM and must not be published elsewhere without written permission. The form of copyright transfer form is available from the journal website and submission system.
Since July 1, 2019, authors are required to pay APC of 200 USD (200,000 KRW) upon the acceptance. This is charged to articles other than solicited review articles. Authors are also charged for color printing of figures unless the printing is considered necessary by the editorial board (e.g., endoscopic finding, skin lesion or pathology). PEMJ does not provide reprint service.
IX. Archiving policy
The journal is accessible at KoreaMed (https://koreamed.org/), Synapse (https://synapse.koreamed.org/), KMbase (https://kmbase.medric.or.kr/), Korea Citation Index (https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/main.kci), Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.co.kr), and National Library of Korea (http://nl.go.kr) in the event the journal is no longer published.
X. Revenue sources
Revenue sources of the journal include APC, financial support from the KSPEM, advertisement, and the governmental funds.
XI. Advertising policy
Academic contents and editorial decisions of the PEMJ are independent from commercial interests or specific contracts with advertisers. The journal reserves the right to decline any type of advertisement that is harmful to the value of the journal. Advertisements should clearly identify the advertiser and the product or service being offered. PEMJ do not allow exaggerated copy and any links between specific advertisements and specific articles, of which contents are related to the products being advertised.
XII. Direct marketing
Journal propagation has been done through the journal website and distribution of the journals. Invitations to submit a manuscript are usually focused on the members of the relevant societies, presenters at conferences, seminars or workshops if the topic is relevant to the aims and scope.
Submission system: https://submit.pemj.org/.
2-3. Checklist for authors
- Original articles and case reports need an approval or exemption by the IRB and IRB no.
- Double-spaced typing with 12-point font.
Title page with type of manuscript, title (≤50 words), authors’ full name(s) and affiliation, information for correspondence (ORCID, postal address, phone number, fax number, and e-mail address), running title (≤10 words), and proof of language-editing (optional).
Sequence of blinded manuscripts: abstract with keywords, introduction, methods, results, discussion (Do not make a conclusion section), ORCIDs (all authors), COI, funding sources, acknowledgments (optional), references, and figure legends (Do not embed figures and tables in manuscripts).
Check word limits for abstract with 5-10 keywords as in MeSH heading: original or review articles, ≤300 words; case reports, ≤200 words; and brief communications, ≤100 words. In case of original articles, abstracts should be structured.
- Include a word count for main body only, exclusive of title, abstract, references, tables, and figure legends.
- All tables, figures, and appendices should be cited in the main body.
- References listed in a proper format. Check that all listed references are cited in the text and vice versa.
- Cover letter stating its scientific significance, the material has not been published previously, and will not be submitted for publication elsewhere, and stating COI of all listed authors, if any.
- Upload the copyright transfer form, author contribution form, and if necessary, publication of patient information form.