| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact us |  
top_img
Pediatric Emergency Medicine Journal > Volume 13(3); 2026 > Article
Goo, Jeong, and Sung: Trends and clinical characteristics across the full spectrum of pediatric psychiatric emergency department visits

Abstract

Purpose

We analyzed annual trends and clinical characteristics across the full spectrum of pediatric psychiatric emergency department (ED) visits.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients aged 18 years or younger who underwent psychiatric interview at the ED of Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Jinju, South Korea, from January 2013 through December 2023. The patients were classified as per their clinical presentations: suicide attempt (SA), non-suicidal self-harm (NSSH), suicidal ideation (SI), and other psychiatric problems (OPP). Annual trend was analyzed using the simple linear regression, while group characteristics were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests.

Results

Of 730 patients, 688 and 465 were included for the annual trend and comparative analyses, respectively. Over the 11-year period, their psychiatric ED visits increased (P <0.001), with the most prominent increase in the SA group. A median age was 16.0 years (interquartile range, 14.0–17.0), and 69.2% of the patients were female. Although female patients predominated in all groups, the predominance was more prominent in the SA and NSSH groups. Drug ingestion (60.0%) was the most common mechanism; cutting was more frequent in the NSSH group (SA, 21.7% vs. NSSH, 49.0%; P <0.001), while highly lethal methods were more frequent in the SA group (e.g., falls: 10.1% vs. 0%; P = 0.001). Regarding psychosocial stressors, family-related factors were highest in the SA and NSSH groups (P = 0.002), social/interpersonal (P = 0.026) and academic (P = 0.044) in the NSSH group, psychosocial trauma-related in the SI group (P = 0.005), and individual/psychiatric in the OPP group (P <0.001). A median ED length of stay and hospitalization rate were longest or highest in the SA group (all Ps <0.001).

Conclusion

Pediatric psychiatric patients presenting to EDs represent a heterogeneous population, and tailored intervention strategies are needed for each clinical manifestation group.

Introduction

Mental health problems in children and adolescents are emerging as a major public health concern worldwide (1). According to the 2022 Korean Domestic Child and Adolescent Mental Health Survey, the lifetime prevalence of mental disorders among children and adolescents reached 16.1%, whereas only 6.6% used mental health services (2). This treatment gap may delay timely intervention, leading to emergency department (ED) visits during acute psychiatric crises, including suicide attempt (SA) or non-suicidal self-harm (NSSH) (3,4). A steady increase was noted in ED visits for mental health problems among children and adolescents in Korea (5,6), highlighting the growing role of EDs in pediatric psychiatric care (7,8).
Pediatric psychiatric patients presenting to EDs are a heterogeneous population with diverse clinical presentations. Some patients present after SA or NSSH, requiring treatment for both physical injury and psychiatric risk assessment. Others present with suicidal ideation (SI) without physical NSSH, or with other psychiatric problems (OPP) such as anxiety, agitation, aggression, depressive symptoms, or exacerbation of preexisting psychiatric disorders. Although previous studies have mainly focused on the SA and NSSH (9-11), these non-injury or non-self-harm presentations also require timely ED-based intervention (12). In Korea, suicide has remained the leading cause of adolescent death (13), and the rate of ED visits related to SA or NSSH has increased annually (5). While domestic studies have primarily focused on SA or NSSH, there remains a scarcity of studies on the full spectrum of pediatric psychiatric ED presentations (6,9,14).
Therefore, we aimed to examine 11-year annual trends in pediatric psychiatric ED visits and to compare clinical characteristics across 4 clinical presentation groups: SA, NSSH, SI, and OPP, thereby characterizing the full spectrum of psychiatric emergencies.

Methods

We conducted a single-center retrospective study at the regional emergency medical center of Gyeongsang National University Hospital, located in Jinju, Korea, from January 2013 through December 2023. The ED provides emergency care and psychiatric consultation as a regional referral center for acute conditions on a 24/7 basis. Psychiatric consultations were conducted by psychiatric residents or board-certified psychiatrists. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Gyeongsang National University Hospital with a waiver for informed consent given its retrospective nature and minimal risk to study participants (IRB no. 2024-04-14).
We included all pediatric patients (≤18 years) who presented to the ED with psychiatric complaints and received formal psychiatric interview. Data were collected from the ED records and psychiatric consultation notes. Patients with incomplete psychiatric evaluation were excluded, including those involving refusal of such interviews by the patients or legal guardians, absconding, discharge against medical advice, or death. All eligible visits, including repeat visits, were included in the annual trend analysis. For the comparative patient-level analysis, only the first visit by each patient was included to ensure statistical independence. Given its clinical implications, repeat visit patterns were analyzed at the patient level according to the clinical presentation groups (see definitions of terms in Appendix 1 [https://doi.org/10.22470/pemj.2026.01627]).
To characterize the full spectrum of psychiatric ED presentations, patients were classified into 4 mutually exclusive clinical presentation groups, according to the main clinical presentations during the index visit: SA, NSSH, SI, and OPP (Appendix 1). This classification was performed by 2 independent investigators, with any discrepancies resolved through discussion and consensus. When multiple symptoms were documented, the primary reason for the ED visit was determined based on the records. For patients in the OPP group, we additionally reviewed the specific reasons for the visits and the principal psychiatric diagnoses.
Variables related to baseline characteristics included age, sex, living with both parents, presence of siblings, family history of psychiatric disorders, presence of family members at ED arrival, previous NSSH or SA, and details of psychiatric treatment (currently in treatment, treatment discontinued, or no history of treatment). Variables related to clinical characteristics were the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale levels 1–3, injury mechanisms (drug ingestion, cutting, fall from a height, hanging/strangulation, or drowning), psychosocial stressors (family, social/interpersonal, academic, psychosocial trauma [documented experiences of sexual violence, domestic child abuse, or school violence], or individual/psychiatric), time to psychiatric interview, ED length of stay (EDLOS), and ED disposition (outpatient referral, hospitalization, or transfer-out).
All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS software ver. 21.0 (IBM Corp.). Annual trends in psychiatric ED visits were analyzed using simple linear regression. Regression coefficients (B), 95% confidence intervals, and P values were reported to indicate the estimated annual change in the number of ED visits. For the characteristics, the normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous variables were expressed as medians with interquartile ranges and compared among the 4 groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Dunn test with Bonferroni correction for post hoc pairwise comparisons. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square tests or Fisher exact tests. Post hoc analyses were conducted using adjusted standardized residuals, with an absolute value of >1.96 considered significant. A P <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

During the study period, 730 pediatric patients who visited the ED for psychiatric complaints were identified. Excluding patients undergoing incomplete psychiatric evaluation, 688 patients were included in the annual trend analysis, of whom 465 were included in the comparative patient-level analysis (Figure 1). The annual number of pediatric psychiatric ED patients increased significantly over the period by the simple linear regression (Figure 2; see numerical data in Appendix 2 [https://doi.org/10.22470/pemj.2026.01627]). The total number increased by an estimated 8.79 patients per year, with the largest annual increase observed in the SA group at 2.99 patients per year.
The baseline characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1. Although median ages differed significantly among the clinical presentation groups, the statistical significance was not considered clinically meaningful. The other significant differences were observed in the sex, living with both parents, presence of siblings, presence of family members at ED arrival, previous NSSH or SA, and previous psychiatric treatment. Although female patients predominated in all groups, the female proportions were higher in the SA and NSSH groups than in the other 2 groups. Patients in the SA group were less likely to live with both parents or have arrived at the ED with their family members. Previous NSSH was more common in the SA and NSSH groups than in the other groups, whereas previous SA was more frequent in the SA and SI groups than in the other groups. Current psychiatric treatment was more common in the NSSH and SI groups than in the other groups.
Clinical characteristics of the groups are summarized in Table 2. The SA group had the highest proportion of a Korean Triage and Acuity Scale 1–3. Among the patients in the SA or NSSH group, drug ingestion was the most common method (60.0%). Cutting was more frequent in the NSSH group, whereas highly lethal methods, including falls from a height, hanging/strangulation, and drowning, were observed exclusively in the SA group.
Psychosocial stressors differed across the groups (Table 2). Family-related, social/interpersonal, and academic stressors were most frequently reported in the NSSH group, followed by the SA group. Psychosocial trauma-related stressors were most frequent in the SI group, whereas individual/psychiatric ones were so in the OPP group.
Median values of the time to psychiatric interview and EDLOS were longest in the SA group (Table 3). ED disposition differed among the groups: the SA group had the highest rates of hospitalization or transfer, whereas the NSSH group had the most frequent outpatient referral.
Among the 465 patients included in the first-visit analysis, 115 patients (24.7%) had at least 1 repeat ED visit during the period, with a total of 223 repeat visit events after the index visits (Table 4). The proportion of patients with such visits was highest in the SI group (51.0%). Among the patients with at least 1 repeat visit, 53.9% returned with the same presentations as their index visits, while 36 of 84 repeat visitors initially presenting with NSSH, SI, or OPP (42.9%) returned with more severe presentations. Subsequent or recurrent SAs occurred in 33.0%.
Details of the OPP group are presented in Appendix 3 (https://doi.org/10.22470/pemj.2026.01627). The most common primary reason for the visits was internalizing symptoms, including anxiety, panic, or depressive symptoms (33.9%), followed by agitation/aggressive behavior, somatic symptoms related to psychiatric distress, and psychotic symptoms. Psychotic disorders were the most common category of the principal psychiatric diagnosis.

Discussion

This study evaluated the full spectrum of pediatric psychiatric ED visits over the 11-year period at a Korean regional emergency medical center. Overall, such visits increased more than threefold during the period. Although self-harm and suicidality-related presentations accounted for a large proportion of visits, OPP represented the largest group, indicating that psychiatric emergencies in the ED extended beyond the spectrum of SA, NSSH, and SI. Distinct psychosocial and clinical characteristics were observed across the 4 clinical manifestation groups.
The increase in psychiatric ED visits in this study (Figure 1) is consistent with trends reported in Korea and other countries (5,15). In particular, marked increases in the visits related to SA and NSSH groups are clinically concerning (16), as such patients require both treatment of physical injuries and psychiatric risk assessment. Patients with SI or OPP also require timely evaluation, safety planning, or acute symptom stabilization depending on their presentations. These findings support the need for ED-based systems that provide timely psychiatric assessment, risk stratification, and linkage to psychiatric follow-up care.
This full-spectrum approach highlights the clinical importance of patients with OPP who are often underrepresented in studies of pediatric psychiatric emergencies. In the present study, the OPP represented the largest group and showed characteristics distinct from those of the self-harm/suicidality-related groups (Table 1). The relatively higher male proportion in the OPP group was presumed to be partly related to differences in psychiatric symptom expressions (5,14-16). Adolescent females are more often represented in suicide and self-harm behaviors, whereas males may more commonly present with externalizing symptoms such as agitation or aggressive behavior (17,18). The additional analyses of the OPP group further support the clinical relevance of the manifestations, showing diverse acute psychiatric symptoms and heterogeneous principal psychiatric diagnoses. These findings suggest that OPP should not be regarded merely as a residual category, but as an important distinct group within psychiatric ED presentations. The OPP group also had a relatively low rate of current psychiatric treatment (Table 1). Taken together with the diverse manifestations and diagnoses observed in the group, this finding suggests that EDs may serve as an initial point of psychiatric assessment for such manifestations. However, this interpretation should be made cautiously because the present study did not evaluate prior unmet needs for mental health services or barriers to outpatient psychiatric care.
The methods of suicide or self-harm have been reported as commonly involving drug ingestion and cutting (3,19), which were observed in our study. In particular, the finding that drug ingestion was the most common injury mechanisms suggests the importance of assessing access to household or prescription medications during the ED stay. Although the NSSH means the absence of suicidal intent by definition (20), no highly lethal methods (e.g., falls from a height) were observed in the NSSH group (Table 2). However, NSSH is associated with subsequent suicidal behavior and requires careful risk assessment and follow-ups (21,22). Indeed, the highly lethal methods, which were observed only in the SA group, require immediate medical and psychiatric intervention (23).
The repeat visit analysis also supports the importance of follow-ups after psychiatric ED visits. Patients initially presenting with SI had the highest repeat visit rate, and some initially presenting with NSSH or SI subsequently returned with SA (Table 4). These findings suggest that non-fatal or non-injurious presentations may still indicate ongoing or escalating risk in a subset of patients (24), indicating the importance of structured suicide risk assessment, safety planning, or linkage to follow-up care after ED discharge.
The underlying factors associated with the psychiatric presentations differed among the groups. The higher frequency of family-related stressors in the SA or NSSH groups (Table 2) is consistent with previous studies showing the associations between family factors and adolescent suicidal behavior (25). These findings support the importance of considering familial context during ED assessment of adolescents presenting with self-harm or suicidality. The prominence of academic stress in the NSSH group is also consistent with previous reports linking school-related stress to adolescent NSSH (26), supporting the need to assess the stress in EDs. Psychosocial trauma-related stressors were most prominent in the SI group, supporting the need to assess the medical history of trauma in adolescents presenting with SI.
The SA group showed the highest proportions of high acuity, the longest median values of the time to psychiatric interview and EDLOS, and the highest hospitalization rate among the groups (Tables 2, 3). These suggest that patients presenting after SAs may require more intensive medical and psychiatric management (27). The findings related to the time intervals may reflect the need for medical stabilization, psychiatric risk assessment, disposition planning, and arrangement of inpatient or transfer care. Considering that EDs may be overstimulating places for psychiatric patients (28), these findings support the need for timely psychiatric assessment, safe observation spaces, and efficient disposition pathways.
This study has limitations. First, the excluded patients who did not complete psychiatric evaluation might include patients with severe symptoms who were unable to wait for evaluation, or those with relatively minor symptoms who left early at the discretion of their guardians. This exclusion may have affected the proportion of a variable of each group, as well as the EDLOS or disposition. Second, the repeat visit analysis did not include visits to other institutions. Although our hospital is the only institution in the region that provides psychiatric consultation in the ED, the recurrence of psychiatric crises or progression to more severe presentations might have been underestimated. Third, given the inherent features of retrospective chart review, the categorization of the clinical manifestations largely depended on documented suicidal intent and reports from patients or guardians. Thus, misclassification may have occurred when suicidal intent was unclear or incompletely documented. Fourth, the study lacked an analysis of the potential impact of changes in ED operations, referral patterns, psychiatric consultation availability, documentation practices, or social awareness of pediatric mental health problems during the study period. Finally, the single-center setting may limit the generalizability of our study findings to other settings.
In conclusion, pediatric psychiatric patients presenting to EDs represent a heterogeneous population across a broad spectrum of clinical presentations, including SA, NSSH, SI, and OPP. The distinct clinical characteristics observed across the clinical manifestations suggest that psychiatric patients who visit EDs should be managed by assessment tailored for each manifestation.

Notes

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, and Visualization: JM Goo and JH Jeong

Data curation, Investigation, and Validation: all authors

Project administration, Resources, and Supervision: JH Jeong

Writing-original draft: JM Goo and JH Jeong

Writing-review and editing: JH Jeong and A Sung

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Funding sources

No funding source relevant to this article was reported.

Fig. 1.
Study population. See numerical data in Appendix 2. Simple linear regression showed an increase in the annual number of pediatric psychiatric ED visits over the 11-year study period (P<0.001). ED: emergency department.
pemj-2026-01627f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Annual pediatric psychiatric emergency department visits by the clinical presentation groups, 2013–2023.
pemj-2026-01627f2.jpg
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of pediatric psychiatric patients visiting the ED, according to the clinical presentation groups
Characteristic Total (N = 465) SA (N = 129) NSSH (N = 96) SI (N = 51) OPP* (N = 189) P value
Age, y 16.0 (14.0–17.0) 16.0 (14.0–17.0) 16.0 (15.0–17.0) 15.0 (14.0–16.5) 16.0 (14–17.0) 0.018
Female sex 322 (69.2) 104 (80.6) 79 (82.3) 35 (68.6) 104 (55.0) <0.001
Living with both parents 336/458 (73.4) 84/128 (65.6) 67 (69.8) 40/49 (81.6) 145/185 (78.4) 0.034
Presence of siblings 383/458 (83.6) 111/128 (86.7) 87 (90.6) 40 (78.4) 145/183 (79.2) 0.048
Family history of psychiatric disorders 178/459 (38.8) 43/127 (33.9) 34 (35.4) 22 (43.1) 79/185 (42.7) 0.339
Presence of family members at ED arrival 407 (87.5) 104 (80.6) 82 (85.4) 46 (90.2) 175 (92.6) 0.013
Previous NSSH 163/464 (35.1) 68 (52.7) 60 (62.5) 17 (33.3) 18/188 (9.6) <0.001
Previous SA 61/464 (13.1) 26 (20.2) 11 (11.5) 14 (27.5)† 10/188 (5.3) <0.001
Psychiatric treatment <0.001
 Currently in treatment 242 (52.0) 75 (58.1) 61 (63.5) 36 (70.6)† 70 (37.0)
 Treatment discontinued 76 (16.3) 17 (13.2) 12 (12.5) 9 (17.6) 38 (20.1)
 No history of treatment 147 (31.6) 37 (28.7) 23 (24.0) 6 (11.8)† 81 (42.9)

Values are expressed as medians (interquartile ranges) or numbers (%). The denominator is marked only if it differs from the total number of the column (“N”) due to missing values.

* See details of the OPP group in Appendix 3.

A significant difference in post hoc analysis.

ED: emergency department, SA: suicide attempt, NSSH: non-suicidal self-harm, SI: suicidal ideation, OPP: other psychiatric problems.

Table 2.
Clinical characteristics associated with reason for the ED presentation, according to the clinical presentation groups
Characteristic Total (N = 465) SA (N = 129) NSSH (N = 96) SI (N = 51) OPP (N = 189) P value
Korean Triage and Acuity Scale 1–3 280/399 (70.2) 99/112 (88.4)* 51/90 (56.7)* 29/46 (63.0) 101/151 (66.9) <0.001
Injury mechanisms
 Drug ingestion 135 (60.0) 83 (64.3) 52 (54.2) NA NA 0.123
 Cutting 75 (33.3) 28 (21.7)* 47 (49.0)* NA NA <0.001
 Fall from a height 13 (5.8) 13 (10.1)* 0 (0)* NA NA 0.001
 Hanging/strangulation 8 (3.6) 8 (6.2)* 0 (0)* NA NA 0.013
 Drowning 2 (0.9) 2 (1.6) 0 (0) NA NA 0.22
 Other methods§ 3 (1.3) 1 (0.8) 2 (2.1) NA NA 0.397
Psychosocial stressors
 Family 149 (32.0) 51 (39.5)* 39 (40.6)* 17 (33.3) 42 (22.2)* 0.002
 Social/interpersonal 153 (32.9) 49 (38.0) 40 (41.7)* 15 (29.4) 49 (25.9)* 0.026
 Academic 39 (8.4) 11 (8.5) 14 (14.6)* 1 (2.0) 13 (6.9) 0.044
 Psychosocial trauma 55 (11.8) 18 (14.0) 7 (7.3) 13 (25.5)* 17 (9.0) 0.005
 Individual/psychiatric 223 (48.0) 46 (35.7)* 32 (33.3)* 26 (51.0) 119 (63.0)* <0.001

Values are expressed as numbers (%). The denominator is marked only if it differs from the total number of the column (“N”) due to missing values.

* A significant difference in post hoc analysis.

The percentages are calculated based on 225 patients in the SA and NSSH groups who engaged in physical self-harm.

Mutually inclusive.

§ One patient with glass-related self-injury in the SA group, and one with carbon monoxide exposure and the other with unspecified self-injury in the NSSH group.

ED: emergency department, SA: suicide attempt, NSSH: non-suicidal self-harm, SI: suicidal ideation, OPP: other psychiatric problems.

Table 3.
ED outcomes according to the clinical presentation groups
Variable Total (N = 465) SA (N = 129) NSSH (N = 96) SI (N = 51) OPP (N = 189) P value
Time to psychiatric interview, min 150.6 (81.9–274.7) 196.2 (121.2–376.8) 171.0 (99.8–283.2) 111.3 (62.2–175.8) 120.0 (69.0–237.0) <0.001
EDLOS, min 601.5 (345.9–1,040.1) 838.5 (410.2–1,278.0) 571.5 (406.6–884.4) 438.0 (282.6–781.2) 571.8 (330.0–975.0) <0.001
ED disposition <0.001
 Outpatient referral 327/464 (70.5) 70/128 (54.7)* 80 (83.3)* 41 (80.4) 136 (72.0)
 Hospitalization 96/464 (20.7) 46/128 (35.9)* 10 (10.4)* 5 (9.8)* 35 (18.5)
 Transfer 41/464 (8.8) 12/128 (9.4) 6 (6.2) 5 (9.8) 18 (9.5)

Values are expressed as medians (interquartile ranges) or numbers (%). The denominator is marked only if it differs from the total number of the column (“N”) due to missing values.

* A significant difference in post hoc analysis.

Intended for psychiatric hospitalization.

ED: emergency department, SA: suicide attempt, NSSH: non-suicidal self-harm, SI: suicidal ideation, OPP: other psychiatric problems, EDLOS: emergency department length of stay.

Table 4.
Patterns of repeat ED visits according to the clinical presentation groups
Pattern Total (N = 465) SA (N = 129) NSSH (N = 96) SI (N = 51) OPP (N = 189)
Patients with at least 1 repeat visit 115 (24.7) 31 (24.0) 19 (19.8) 26 (51.0) 39 (20.6)
Number of repeat visits after the index visit* 223 55 31 58 79
Same presentation at any repeat visits 62 (53.9) 14 (45.2) 10 (52.6) 4 (15.4) 34 (87.2)
More severe presentation at any repeat visits 36/84 (42.9) NA 10 (52.6) 16 (61.5) 10 (25.6)
Subsequent SA at any repeat visits 38 (33.0) 14 (45.2) 10 (52.6) 10 (38.5) 4 (10.3)

Values are expressed as numbers (%).

* Total number of events, not of patients. For example, if a patient visited the ED a total of 3 times, the number is 2.

The denominators are 115, 31, 19, 26, and 39 in the order of columns unless otherwise indicated.

The denominator is 84, which is the sum of 19, 26, and 39, excluding the SA group for which a more severe category was not applicable.

ED: emergency department, SA: suicide attempt, NSSH: non-suicidal self-harm, SI: suicidal ideation, OPP: other psychiatric problems.

References

1. Kieling C, Baker-Henningham H, Belfer M, Conti G, Ertem I, Omigbodun O, et al. Child and adolescent mental health worldwide: evidence for action. Lancet 2011;378:1515–25.
crossref pmid pmc
2. National Center for Mental Health. 2022 National Survey on Mental Health of Children and Adolescents (MIND No. 3) [Internet]. National Center for Mental Health; 2024 [cited 2026 Mar 31]. Available from: https://www.mentalhealth.go.kr/portal/bbs/bbsDetail.do?bbsId=BBSINIT_4&nttId=691. Korean.

3. Cheon J, Oh D, Lee J, Ahn J, Song DH, Cheon KA, et al. Increasing trend and characteristics of Korean adolescents presenting to emergency department for self-harm: a 5-year experience, 2015 to 2019. Yonsei Med J 2020;61:614–22.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
4. Lustig S, Koenig J, Resch F, Kaess M. Help-seeking duration in adolescents with suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury. J Psychiatr Res 2021;140:60–7.
crossref pmid
5. Park H, Oh MR, Roh EH, Huh YJ, Hong SI, Kim YJ, et al. Trends in mental health-related emergency department visits among adolescents and young adults: a nationwide, population-based study in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2025;40:e316.
pmid pmc
6. Jung KY, Kim T, Ro YS. Epidemiology of suicide attempts and self-harm in emergency departments: a report from the National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) of Korea, 2018–2022. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2023;10:S69–74.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
7. Kurdyak P, Gandhi S, Holder L, Rashid M, Saunders N, Chiu M, et al. Incidence of access to ambulatory mental health care prior to a psychiatric emergency department visit among adults in Ontario, 2010-2018. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e215902.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Gill PJ, Saunders N, Gandhi S, Gonzalez A, Kurdyak P, Vigod S, et al. Emergency department as a first contact for mental health problems in children and youth. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2017;56:475–482.e4.
crossref pmid
9. Kim E, Han DH, Hwang H, Kim NY, Chung SA, Han L, et al. Comparison of clinical indicators for non-suicidal self-injury and suicide attempts in the emergency department. J Korean Med Sci 2025;40:e205.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
10. Poyraz Findik OT, Erdoğdu AB, Fadıloğlu E, Rodopman Arman A. Emergency department visits for non-suicidal self-harm, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts in children and adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2022;53:289–99.
crossref pmid pdf
11. Bommersbach TJ, Olfson M, Rhee TG. National trends in emergency department visits for suicide attempts and intentional self-harm. Am J Psychiatry 2024;181:741–52.
crossref pmid
12. Virk F, Waine J, Berry C. A rapid review of emergency department interventions for children and young people presenting with suicidal ideation. BJPsych Open 2022;8:e56.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Statistics Korea. Causes of death statistics, 2024 [Internet]. Korean Statistical Information Service; 2025 [cited 2026 Mar 31]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsListIndex.do?menuId=M_01_01&vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parmTabId=M_01_01&parentId=F.1;F_27.2;&outLink=Y#F_27.2. Korean.

14. Yoon TY, Lee HS, Son JW, Kim SM, Lee JJ. Clinical characteristics of adolescents hospitalized through emergency room for intentional self-harm or suicide attempts. J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2022;33:59–66.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Kalb LG, Stapp EK, Ballard ED, Holingue C, Keefer A, Riley A, et al. Trends in psychiatric emergency department visits among youth and young adults in the US. Pediatrics 2019;143:e20182192.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
16. Kim H, Ryu JM, Kim HW. Characteristics and trends of suicide attempt or non-suicidal self-injury in children and adolescents visiting emergency department. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35:e276.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
17. Askari MS, Rutherford CG, Mauro PM, Kreski NT, Keyes KM. Structure and trends of externalizing and internalizing psychiatric symptoms and gender differences among adolescents in the US from 1991 to 2018. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2022;57:737–48.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
18. Hawton K, Saunders KE, O’Connor RC. Self-harm and suicide in adolescents. Lancet 2012;379:2373–82.
crossref pmid
19. Adhilah N, Setiawati Y. Current phenomenon of self-harm in children and adolescents. J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2025;36:47–53.
crossref pmid pmc
20. Apicella M, Pontillo M, Maglio G, Di Vincenzo C, Della Santa G, Andracchio E, et al. Non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a clinician’s guide to understanding the phenomenon, diagnostic challenges, and evidence-based treatments. Front Psychiatry 2025;16:1605508.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Rosenbaum Asarnow J, Berk M, Zhang L, Wang P, Tang L. Emergency department youth patients with suicidal ideation or attempts: predicting suicide attempts through 18 months of follow‐up. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2017;47:551–66.
crossref pmid pdf
22. Nock MK, Joiner TE, Gordon KH, Lloyd-Richardson E, Prinstein MJ. Non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents: Diagnostic correlates and relation to suicide attempts. Psychiatry Res 2006;144:65–72.
crossref pmid pmc
23. Lee SY, Song KJ, Hong KJ, Park JH, Kim TH, Jeong J, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of severe injury patients related to suicide attempt or self-harm in Korea: nationwide community-based study, 2016–2020. Injury 2025;56:112032.
crossref pmid
24. Chesin MS, Galfavy H, Sonmez CC, Wong A, Oquendo MA, Mann JJ, et al. Nonsuicidal self-injury is predictive of suicide attempts among individuals with mood disorders. Suicide Life Threat Behav 2017;47:567–79.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
25. Alvarez-Subiela X, Castellano-Tejedor C, Villar-Cabeza F, Vila-Grifoll M, Palao-Vidal D. Family factors related to suicidal behavior in adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:9892.
crossref pmid pmc
26. Jeong JY, Kim DH. Gender differences in the prevalence of and factors related to non-suicidal self-injury among middle and high school students in South Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:5965.
crossref pmid pmc
27. Chakravarthy B, Yang A, Ogbu U, Kim C, Iqbal A, Haight J, et al. Determinants of pediatric psychiatry length of stay in 2 urban emergency departments. Pediatr Emerg Care 2017;33:613–9.
crossref pmid
28. Saidinejad M, Duffy S, Wallin D, Hoffmann JA, Joseph MM, Uhlenbrock JS, et al. The management of children and youth with pediatric mental and behavioral health emergencies. Pediatrics 2023;152:e2023063255.
crossref pmid

Appendices

Appendix 1.
Operational definitions of key terms
Group Definition Note
Four clinical presentation groups
 SA Patients who engaged in intentional self-harm with a clear intent to die. Drug ingestion, falls from a height, hanging, or other methods.
 NSSH Intentional self-harm without an intent to die, as explicitly documented in ED records. “No intent to die” or “cut wrists due to anxiety.”
 SI Patients with suicidal thoughts or plans without any actual self-harm behavior, as recorded in medical notes. “Patient reported suicidal thoughts” or “wishes to die.”
 OPP Patients presenting with psychiatric symptoms or behavioral problems without self-harm or SI during the current visit. The primary reason for ED presentation and principal psychiatric diagnosis were additionally reviewed.
Repeat visit analysis
 Same presentation A revisit with the same clinical presentation as the initial visit. NA
 More severe presentation A transition from OPP to SI, NSSH, or SA; from SI to NSSH or SA; or from NSSH to SA during any subsequent ED visit.

SA: suicide attempt, NSSH: non-suicidal self-harm, ED: emergency department; SI: suicidal ideation, OPP: other psychiatric problems.

Appendix 2.
Annual number of pediatric psychiatric ED visits by clinical presentation (2013–2023)
Year Total SA NSSH SI OPP
2013 28 6 1 3 18
2014 30 6 4 1 19
2015 24 5 3 1 15
2016 45 10 13 0 22
2017 41 8 7 2 24
2018 53 17 10 9 17
2019 82 24 13 9 36
2020 95 14 23 13 45
2021 110 23 31 12 44
2022 72 25 14 8 25
2023 108 41 31 8 28
Total 688 179 150 66 293
B (95% CI)* 8.79 2.99 2.73 1.08 1.99
(5.62–11.96) (1.83–4.15) (1.49–3.97) (0.39–1.78) (0.11–3.87)
P value <0.001 <0.001 0.001 0.006 0.04

* B indicates the unstandardized regression coefficient from simple linear regression, representing the estimated annual change in the number of ED visits.

ED: emergency department, SA: suicide attempt, NSSH: non-suicidal self-harm, SI: suicidal ideation, OPP: other psychiatric problems, CI: confidence interval.

Appendix 3.
Details of the other psychiatric problems (N = 189)
Psychiatric problem Number (%)
Primary reason for ED presentation
 Internalizing symptoms, including anxiety, panic, or depressive symptoms 64 (33.9)
 Agitation/aggressive behavior 46 (24.3)
 Somatic symptoms related to psychiatric distress 41 (21.7)
 Psychotic symptoms 38 (20.1)
Principal psychiatric diagnosis
 Psychotic disorders 35 (18.5)
 Depressive disorders 29 (15.3)
 Anxiety disorders 24 (12.7)
 Bipolar disorders 18 (9.5)
 Adjustment disorders 16 (8.5)
 Trauma/stressor-related disorders 10 (5.3)
 Obsessive-compulsive disorders 2 (1.1)
 Other or unspecified diagnoses* 55 (29.1)

* Diagnoses that were infrequent or did not fit into the main diagnostic categories.

ED: emergency department.

Editorial Office
The Korean Society of Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Chungmu-building office 213, 197, Toegye-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04557, Korea
TEL: +82-2-3674-7888   FAX: +82-2-3674-7889   E-mail: editor@pemj.org
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors
Copyright © Korean Society of Pediatric Emergency Medicine.                 Developed in M2PI
Close layer
prev next