소아 천공충수염과 백혈구계산 및 적혈구침강속도 증가의 연관

High white blood cell count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate are associated with perforated appendicitis in children

Article information

Pediatr Emerg Med J. 2017;4(2):51-57
Publication date (electronic) : 2017 September 12
doi : https://doi.org/10.22470/pemj.2017.00101
Department of Emergency Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
김윤호, 우선희orcid_icon, 이운정, 설승환, 김대희, 이준영, 최승필1
가톨릭대학교 인천성모병원 응급의학과
1가톨릭대학교 여의도성모병원 응급의학과
Corresponding Author Seon Hee Woo (http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8914-1640) Department of Emergency Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 56 Dongsu-ro, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon 21431, Korea Tel: +82-32-280-6116 Fax: +82-32-280-6120 E-mail: drme@catholic.ac.kr
Received 2017 June 24; Revised 2017 August 31; Accepted 2017 September 1.

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the predictors of perforated appendicitis (PA) in pediatric patients with appendicitis seen in the emergency department.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 564 pediatric patients (< 16 years) who visited the emergency department and subsequently had pathologically confirmed appendicitis from 2005 through 2014. Clinical features, inflammatory markers, including the white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the Alvarado score were compared between the patients with and without PA regarding their predictability of PA.

Results

Of 564 pediatric patients with appendicitis, 204 (36.2%) had PAs. The patients with PA had longer duration of symptoms and median length of hospital stay, more frequent nausea and vomiting, and higher median WBC and neutrophil counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, ESR, and CRP concentration. Overall, WBC count showed the highest sensitivity of 79.9% and negative predictive value of 82.6%, and CRP concentration had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72. Multivariable logistic analysis showed that WBC count > 13.5 × 109/L (odds ratio [OR], 3.27; confidence interval [CI], 1.49-7.18; P = 0.003) and ESR > 15 mm/h (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 2.13-4.74; P < 0.001) are independent predictors of PA.

Conclusion

WBC count and ESR might be better predictors of PA in pediatric patients with appendicitis in the emergency department than the Alvarado score and CRP concentration.

Introduction

In pediatric patients, perforated appendicitis (PA) requires an expeditious diagnosis and proper surgical treatment [1]. PA is more common in patients aged younger than 4 years than in adolescents (< 70% vs. < 15%) [2-4]. The nonspecific symptoms and difficult communication with pediatric patients may delay the diagnosis [4,5]. This delay could complicate the surgery, increase the length of hospital stay, and aggravate the outcome [5-7]. The outcome might be improved with an early prediction of PA in the emergency department (ED).

The Alvarado score has been frequently used in predicting appendicitis in adult patients [8-9]. However, in pediatric patients, some components of this scoring system, including migration of pain, anorexia, and nausea, are inaccurate in predicting appnedicitis [8-10]. Given this poor predictability of appendicitis, the Alvarado score might also be inaccurate in predicting PA in pediatric patients. To compensate for this drawback, other potential predictors of PA, such as laboratory findings and imaging modalities, have been studied [4,11-15].

Inflammatory markers measured in the ED are readily and rapidly available for pediatric patients with suspected PA. A high C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration and white blood cell (WBC) count are associated with PA, while there are few studies on other inflammatory markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and the Alvarado score in predicting PA in pediatric patients in the ED [11-16]. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the predictor of PA by comparing inflammatory markers, the Alvarado score, and other features related to PA in pediatric patients who visited the ED and subsequently had pathologically confirmed appendicitis.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed pediatric patients aged younger than 16 years who visited the ED and subsequently had pathologically confirmed appendicitis between January 2005 and December 2014. After obtaining approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB No. OC17RESI0044), we collected and analyzed the patient data. This hospital is a tertiary teaching hospital, and the ED treats approximately 50,000 patients annually. The 564 pediatric patients with appendicitis were identified based on pathologic reports and/or surgical notes. The patients classified into 2 groups depending on documentation of PA on pathologic reports: the perforation and non-perforation groups.

The clinical features were obtained from a chart review, including age, gender, body temperature, duration and migration of abdominal pain, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, right lower quadrant tenderness, and rebound tenderness. We recorded the laboratory findings obtained within 2 hours of presentation, including WBC count, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, red cell distribution width, serum CRP concentration, ESR, and glucose. To assess the outcomes, length of hospital stay was recorded. The Alvarado score [9] was retrospectively calculated in all patients. We classified the pediatric patients into 4 score groups. A score of 0 to 4 indicates non-appendicitis, 5 or 6 for possible appendicitis, 7 or 8 for probable appendicitis, and 9 or 10 for very probable appendicitis.

The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Clinical features of the 2 groups were compared using the Student t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests for continuous variables. The chi-square tests were used to assess categorical variables. The prediction of PA was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves and predictive values, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). A cutoff value with 95% confidence interval (CI), which maximized area under the curve (AUC), was selected. Multivariable logistic regression analysis using the variables having P < 0.05 from the univariable analyses was used to identify independent predictors of PA. The results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Clinical features of the study population

Of 564 pediatric patients with appendicitis, 322 (57.1%) were boys, and 204 (36.2%) had PA. Mean age of the 564 patients was 9.7 ± 3.0 years. The gender and age did not differ significantly between the perforation and non-perforation groups. In the perforation group, nausea and vomiting were more frequent, and the duration of symptoms and median length of hospital stay were longer. The median WBC and neutrophil counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, ESR, and CRP concentration were significantly higher in the perforation group (Table 1).

Clinical features and inflammatory markers of the pediatric patients with and without perforated appendicitis

Predictors of PA

Fig. 1 depicts the AUCs of inflammatory markers and the Alvarado score, and among these variables, CRP concentration had the highest AUC. The AUC for CRP concentration was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.68-0.76; P < 0.001), with a cutoff of 25.7 mg/L, and AUC for WBC count was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.74; P < 0.001), with a cutoff of 13.5 × 109/L. The AUC of the Alvarado score was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.59-0.68; P < 0.001). The perforation group showed higher median Alvarado score, and had more patients having the Alvarado score ≥ 7 (Table 2).

Fig. 1.

The receiver operating characteristic curves of inflammatory markers to predict perforated appendicitis. CRP concentration had the highest AUC (0.72), followed by WBC count (0.71). AUC: area under the curve, CI: confidence interval, CRP: C-reactive protein, WBC: white blood cell, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.

The Alvarado score

Overall, WBC count showed the highest sensitivity and NPV. An Alvarado score ≥ 6 for predicting PA had a 76.0% sensitivity, 43.9% specificity, 43.4% PPV, and 76.3% NPV. An ESR > 15.0 mm/h had a 59.3% sensitivity, 70.9% specificity, 53.7% PPV, and 75.3% NPV, while a WBC count > 13.5× 109/L had a 79.9% sensitivity, 53.9% specificity, 49.5% PPV, and 82.6% NPV. CRP concentration > 25.7 mg/L had a 14.6% sensitivity, 95.7% specificity, 65.9% PPV, and 66.5% NPV.

In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, WBC count > 13.5 × 109/L (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.49-7.18; P = 0.003) and ESR > 15 mm/h (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 2.13-4.74; P < 0.001) were independent predictors of PA in this study population, but CRP concentration was not (P = 0.053) (Table 3).

Multivariable logistic regression analysis for predictors of perforated appendicitis

Discussion

This study found that a high WBC count (>13.5 × 109/L) and ESR (> 15.0 mm/h) are independent predictors of PA in the pediatric patients who visited the ED and subsequently had pathologically confirmed appendicitis. Early detection of PA in children is associated with the decrease in morbidity and mortality [17]. Our findings could help prediction of PA in the ED. However, the AUC for the Alvarado score ≥ 6 in PA alone yielded a poor discriminatory value.

Macklin et al [18]. reported a 76.3% sensitivity and 78.8% specificity with a cutoff Alvarado score of 7 for predicting appendicitis in pediatric patients. In another study that used computed tomography and the Alvarado score in predicting appendicitis, a score ≥ 6 had a 72.8% sensitivity and 61.6% specificity [19]. However, in our series, 20% of the patients with appendicitis had the scores of 0 to 4. Considering the inaccuracy of the Alvarado score in pediatric patients, predicting PA in pediatric patients using only this scoring system remains problematic.

If a patient has a high Alvarado score ≥ 6 points in the ED, inflammatory markers, such as WBC count and ESR, might help predict PA by increasing the sensitivity and NPV. Kafetzis et al [20]. showed that a WBC count > 10.0 × 109/L had a 87.5% sensitivity and 88% NPV for PA in pediatric patients. We obtained a comparable sensitivity and a NPV of WBC count. Another study showed that WBC count combined with CRP concentration had a 96% specificity for PA [13]. Few studies have evaluated the association between ESR and PA [12,16]. One study reported that pediatric patients with PA had a significantly higher ESR than those without PA, although the ESR was measured in a small portion of the patients with appendicitis [12]. Our study shows a relatively low ESR cutoff. In another study, ESR showed a poor correlation with the type of appendicitis [16]. The role of ESR in predicting PA might have been undervalued, and further prospective studies regarding its diagnostic value are needed.

CRP may not always be useful for predicting PA in pediatric patients. An elevated CRP concentration has been reported as a better predictor of PA than the WBC count in adult patients with appendicitis [19,21]. In pediatric patients, CRP has been reported to predict PA [11,22]. A prospective study found that pediatric patients with a CRP concentration > 30 mg/L or a procalcitonin level > 0.2 ng/mL had a greater predictor of PA [11]. However, our study shows lower cutoff of CRP concentration and no association between CRP and PA. This finding may be due to time-dependent changes of CRP concentration. CRP is more accurate after 24 to 48 hours from the symptom onset [23]. In this study, more than 50% of the pediatric patients visited the ED within 24 hours of symptom onset.

The limitations of this study are related to its relatively small study population and retrospective design. First, we included patients with appendicitis seen in the ED, implying the possible selection bias. However, this limitation does not seem critical given that the median age, proportion of boys and PA were comparable to previous studies [12,24]. Second, given the retrospective design, the Alvarado score may have been underestimated due to the lack of information.

In conclusion, a high WBC count (> 13.5 × 109/L) and ESR (> 15.0 mm/h) might be associated with PA in pediatric patients with appendicitis. Conversely, the Alvarado score and CRP concentration may be inadequate to predict PA.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest relevant to this article.

Acknowledgements

We did not receive any financial support for this report.

References

1. Gamal R, Moore TC. Appendicitis in children aged 13 years and younger. Am J Surg 1990;159:589–92.
2. Rappaport WD, Peterson M, Stanton C. Factors responsible for the high perforation rate seen in early childhood appendicitis. Am Surg 1989;55:602–5.
3. Korner H, Sondenaa K, Soreide JA, Andersen E, Nysted A, Lende TH, et al. Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 1997;21:313–7.
4. Rothrock SG, Pagane J. Acute appendicitis in children: emergency department diagnosis and management. Ann Emerg Med 2000;36:39–51.
5. Chang YJ, Chao HC, Kong MS, Hsia SH, Yan DC. Misdiagnosed acute appendicitis in children in the emergency department. Chang Gung Med J 2010;33:551–7.
6. Rothrock SG, Skeoch G, Rush JJ, Johnson NE. Clinical features of misdiagnosed appendicitis in children. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:45–50.
7. Pathak IS, Sayed IA, Wise L, Sippel M, Hernandez LL, Mulla ZD. Predictors of a prolonged length of stay in children with perforated appendicitis. South Med J 2016;109:230–5.
8. Alvarado A. A practical score for the early diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 1986;15:557–64.
9. Subotić AM, Sijacki AD, Dugalić VD, Antić AA, Vuković GM, Vukojević VS, et al. Evaluation of the Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Iugosl 2008;55:55–61.
10. Ohle R, O'Reilly F, O'Brien KK, Fahey T, Dimitrov BD. The Alvarado score for predicting acute appendicitis: a systematic review. BMC Med 2011;9:139.
11. Gavela T, Cabeza B, Serrano A, Casado-Flores J. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin are predictors of the severity of acute appendicitis in children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012;28:416–9.
12. Peng YS, Lee HC, Yeung CY, Sheu JC, Wang NL, Tsai YH. Clinical criteria for diagnosing perforated appendix in pediatric patients. Pediatr Emerg Care 2006;22:475–9.
13. Panagiotopoulou IG, Parashar D, Lin R, Antonowicz S, Wells AD, Bajwa FM, et al. The diagnostic value of white cell count, C-reactive protein and bilirubin in acute appendicitis and its complications. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013;95:215–21.
14. Sammalkorpi HE, Leppaniemi A, Mentula P. High admission C-reactive protein level and longer in-hospital delay to surgery are associated with increased risk of complicated appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2015;400:221–8.
15. Yap TL, Chen Y, Low WW, Ong CC, Nah SA, Jacobsen AS, et al. A new 2-step risk-stratification clinical score for suspected appendicitis in children. J Pediatr Surg 2015;50:2051–5.
16. Sack U, Biereder B, Elouahidi T, Bauer K, Keller T, Trobs RB. Diagnostic value of blood inflammatory markers for detection of acute appendicitis in children. BMC Surg 2006;6:15.
17. Blab E, Kohlhuber U, Tillawi S, Schweitzer M, Stangl G, Ogris E, et al. Advancements in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2004;14:404–9.
18. Macklin CP, Radcliffe GS, Merei JM, Stringer MD. A prospective evaluation of the modified Alvarado score for acute appendicitis in children. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1997;79:203–5.
19. Sun JS, Noh HW, Min YG, Lee JH, Kim JK, Park KJ, et al. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the diagnostic performance of a computed tomographic examination and the Alvarado score for diagnosing acute appendicitis: emphasis on age and sex of the patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008;32:386–91.
20. Kafetzis DA, Velissariou IM, Nikolaides P, Sklavos M, Maktabi M, Spyridis G, et al. Procalcitonin as a predictor of severe appendicitis in children. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2005;24:484–7.
21. Shelton JA, Brown JJ, Young JA. Preoperative C-reactive protein predicts the severity and likelihood of complications following appendicectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2014;96:369–72.
22. Buyukbese Sarsu S, Sarac F. Diagnostic value of white blood cell and C-reactive protein in pediatric appendicitis. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:6508619.
23. Kharbanda AB, Cosme Y, Liu K, Spitalnik SL, Dayan PS. Discriminative accuracy of novel and traditional biomarkers in children with suspected appendicitis adjusted for duration of abdominal pain. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:567–74.
24. Williams RF, Blakely ML, Fischer PE, Streck CJ, Dassinger MS, Gupta H, et al. Diagnosing ruptured appendicitis preoperatively in pediatric patients. J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:819–25.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

The receiver operating characteristic curves of inflammatory markers to predict perforated appendicitis. CRP concentration had the highest AUC (0.72), followed by WBC count (0.71). AUC: area under the curve, CI: confidence interval, CRP: C-reactive protein, WBC: white blood cell, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.

Table 1.

Clinical features and inflammatory markers of the pediatric patients with and without perforated appendicitis

Variable Perforation group (N = 204) Non-perforation group (N = 360) P value
Boy 111 (54.5) 211 (58.6) 0.333
Age, y 9 (7-12) 10 (8-12) 0.051
Duration of symptoms, h 0.002
 < 12 54 (26.5) 144 (40.0)
 12-23 48 (23.5) 92 (25.6)
 24-47 38 (18.6) 57 (15.8)
 48-71 28 (13.7) 27 (7.5)
 ≥ 72 36 (17.6) 40 (11.1)
Temp, °C 36.8 (36.1-37.4) 36.6 (36.1-37.2) 0.109
Migration of pain 59 (28.9) 106 (29.4) 0.896
Anorexia 9 (4.4) 6 (1.7) 0.052
Nausea/vomiting 152 (74.5) 223 (61.9) 0.002
Right lower quadrant pain 180 (88.2) 333 (92.5) 0.09
Rebound tenderness 118 (57.8) 179 (49.7) 0.063
Elevation of temp 59 (28.9) 88 (24.4) 0.245
Length of hospital stay, d 4.0 (3.0-6.0) 3.0 (3.0-4.0) < 0.001
White blood cell, 109/L 16.5 (14.0-19.3) 13.2 (9.2-16.4) < 0.001
Neutrophil, 109/L 14.1 (11.2-16.7) 10.6 (6.6-13.9) < 0.001
Lymphocyte, 109/L 1.5 (1.1-2.1) 1.6 (1.1-2.3) 0.367
NLR 8.9 ( 5.3-14.1) 6.8 (3.4-10.7) < 0.001
RDW, % 12.6 (12.3-13.1) 12.7 (12.3-13.1) 0.531
ESR, mm/h 19.0 (9.0-31.0) 9.5 (5.3-17.0) < 0.001
CRP, mg/L 35.3 (6.1-111.4) 5.4 (1.1-23.7) < 0.001
Glucose, mg/dL 107.0 (95.0-121.0) 106.0 (96.0-118.0) 0.265

Values are expressed as number (%) or median (interquartile range).

NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, RDW: red cell distribution width, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP: C-reactive protein.

Table 2.

The Alvarado score

Variable Perforation group (N = 204) Non-perforation group (N = 360) P value
Alvarado score 7 (6-7) 6 (4-7) < 0.001
Score group < 0.001
 0-4 20 (9.8) 93 (25.8)
 5-6* 76 (37.3) 146 (40.6)
 7-8 99 (48.5) 113 (31.4)
 9-10 9 (4.4) 8 (2.2)

Values are expressed as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

*

Possible appendicitis.

Table 3.

Multivariable logistic regression analysis for predictors of perforated appendicitis

Variable Cut-off value OR 95% Cl P value
White blood cell, 109/L > 13.5 3.27 1.49-7.18 0.003
ESR, mm/h > 15.0 3.18 2.13-4.74 < 0.001
CRP, mg/L > 25.7 2.03 0.99-4.16 0.053
Alvarado score ≥ 6 1.37 0.86-2.20 0.19
Neutrophil, 109/L > 11.0 1.14 0.50-2.59 0.752
NLR > 9.5 1.14 0.72-1.79 0.576

OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP: C-reactive protein, NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio.