| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact us |  
top_img
Pediatric Emergency Medicine Journal > Volume 11(1); 2024 > Article
Oral, Mert, and Köktürk: A non-invasive and simple method of rescuing an entrapped tongue from a glass water bottle for a small state hospital: a case report

Abstract

If children try to vigorously drink fluid from a glass bottle or play with it, their tongues can be entrapped in the bottle wherein the vacuum is created. The entrapped tongue causes lingual edema, leading to the lingual necrosis and upper airway obstruction. In this case, a 5-year-old boy whose tongue was entrapped in a glass bottle visited the emergency department of a small state hospital, where his tongue was removed non-invasively by applying positive pressure into the bottle.

Introduction

The tongue can be entrapped in a bottle when a vacuum is created inside. If the entrapment prolongs, painful lingual edema may lead to agitation, necrosis, or upper airway obstruction (UAO). These sequelae can be prevented by early reduction. The unique situation may need a reduction or removal procedure under general anesthesia (1-3). To bypass the potential risk of anesthesia, the entrapped tongue needs to be reduced non-invasively by applying positive pressure (PP) as an initial measure in emergency departments (EDs) (4,5).

Case

A previously healthy, 5-year-old boy tried to drink water from a glass bottle before going to sleep, and his tongue became entrapped in the bottle due to the vacuum effect. His parents failed to extract the tongue from the bottle using olive oil. Forty-five minutes after the event, the boy was brought to the ED, and evaluated by an emergency physician (EP). The initial vital signs were as follows: blood pressure, 100/65 mmHg; heart rate, 125 beats/minute; respiratory rate, 23 breaths/minute; temperature, 36.9 °C; and oxygen saturation, 99% on room air. Notably, the distal part of the tongue entrapped in the bottle was highly edematous and ecchymotic (Fig. 1). At that time, he was agitated and drooling without dyspnea.
The EP tried to reduce the tongue from the bottle using lubricant gel and traction, but failed. After a subsequent consultation with a pediatric and an orthopedic surgeon, they decided to reduce the tongue by applying PP (2,3). Following the recommendations of the 2 surgeons, the EP successfully performed the procedure in the ED. A plastic 16-gauge intravenous cannula was inserted into the bottle from the side of the tongue, and 40 mL of air was injected into the bottle using a syringe via the cannula. Consequently, the tongue was easily reduced without any damage. Given the stable vital signs and short procedure time, procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) was not applied to the boy. After a 2-hour observation in the ED, the lingual edema and ecchymosis were resolved, and he became able to eat (Fig. 2). Finally, he was discharged uneventfully. At the 2-week follow-up, the boy complained about nothing with the tongue fully recovered.

Discussion

It is rare to encounter a child with the tongue entrapped in an object in EDs. In the literature, most patients were aged 11 years or younger, with the exception of a 28-year-old man with autism (5,6). While children are drinking from a glass bottle, plastic bottle, or aluminum can, they may try to absorb last drops of liquid from the bottle or can, or play with it. This behavioral tendency was reproduced in our case, where the boy created a vacuum in the bottle, leading to the tongue entrapment (1,5). The entrapment can lead to risky conditions, such as edema, UAO, and necrosis despite its wide collateral network.
Tongue entrapment can be relieved by applying PP as in our case, breaking, or cutting the bottle with an instrument, such as a dental drill. In previous cases where PP was applied, PSA was implemented (6). If the entrapment continues, pain may be an important complaint, raising the children’s agitation. Such situations can be prevented by early visits to EDs and timely intervention. We considered the use of PSA unnecessary and potentially harmful given the procedure time and the risk of UAO or aspiration (7).
If advanced, the entrapped tongue develops UAO, making oxygen delivery via masks or endotracheal tubes difficult. In such cases, EPs may need to perform nasotracheal intubation, cricothyroidotomy, or tracheostomy (5,8).
Directly pulling the bottle, or using lubricant gel or oil may be ineffective in relieving the entrapped tongue, and even injure the tongue (7). It has been reported that the tongue was not released even after many holes were made to remove the remaining liquid in a metal bottle, and to eliminate the negative pressure during transport to an ED (9).
Although the ED belongs to a small state hospital where lacks critical care resources, it was possible to non-invasively reduce the entrapped tongue without sequelae in the early period. The early reduction obviated intubation, anesthesia, or a referral to an advanced medical facility.

Notes

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, and Visualization: HO

Data curation: LM and BK

Formal analysis, Investigation: HO and LM

Writing-original draft: HO

Writing-review and editing: all authors

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Funding sources

No funding source relevant to this article was reported.

Fig. 1.
Edematous and ecchymotic state of the boy’s tongue entrapped in the bottle. His legal guardian provided written consent for this case report and the publication of accompanying clinical photographs.
pemj-2023-00717f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Resolution of the lingual edema and ecchymosis 2 hours after the reduction. His legal guardian provided written consent for this case report and the publication of accompanying clinical photographs.
pemj-2023-00717f2.jpg

References

1. Guha SJ, Catz ND. Lingual ischemia following tongue entrapment in a glass bottle. J Emerg Med 1997;15:637–8.
crossref pmid
2. Mills JC, Simon JE. Tongue in cheek? Or in the bottle? Pediatr Emerg Care 1988;4:119–20.
crossref pmid
3. Eich C, Arndt S. Tips and tricks: release of a tongue entrapped in a bottle with the use of positive pressure. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2019;36:976–8.
pmid
4. Long MT, Murray MP. Bottle tongue entrapment: increasingly popular soda becomes airway emergency. Pediatr Emerg Care 2018;34:el56–8.

5. Samuel M, Tyers C, Davies H. Tongue trapped in lid. Br Dent J 2019;227:647–8.
crossref pmid pdf
6. Yee R, Kwek VYX, Bong CL, Chan BH, Wang S, Wong PCY, et al. An unusual case of a foreign body: a child’s tongue entrapped in a soft drink bottle. Dent Traumatol 2022;38:244–9.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Bank DE, Diaz L, Behrman DA, Delaney J, Bizzocco S. Tongue entrapment in an aluminum juice can. Pediatr Emerg Care 2004;20:242–3.
crossref pmid
8. Shah G, Sciarrino J, Barth P, Cook S, O'Reilly R. Tongue entrapment in aluminum water bottle: discussion of removal and airway management. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012;76:757–60.
crossref pmid
9. Whited CW, Rocke DJ, Lee WT. Tongue entrapment in metal drinking bottle. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;137:625–7.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
ePub Link  ePub Link
XML Download  XML Download
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Share:      
METRICS
0
Crossref
1,852
View
40
Download
Related article
Editorial Office
The Korean Society of Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Chungmu-building office 213, 197, Toegye-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04557, Korea
TEL: +82-2-3674-7888   FAX: +82-2-3674-7889   E-mail: pemjpublisher@gmail.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors
Copyright © Korean Society of Pediatric Emergency Medicine.                 Developed in M2PI
Close layer
prev next